按:某种程度上说,狗头萝莉的故事反映了妇女解放的真实途径——劳动解放。
第一次在网上刷到“狗头萝莉”,是2023年2月初。这个微博粉丝高达200多万的网红,半夜在微博上发布遗书说要自杀,掀起网友整夜大搜救,甚至惊动警方大V,直到第二天,朋友在一栋江边废楼里找到了她。
没过几天,朋友替她在微博上晒出粉丝的关爱私信,向他们道谢。私信截屏里,鲜花和爱心密密麻麻,质疑她自杀作秀的声音并不占主流。
我刷了几下她的微博,明显动过的漂亮脸蛋,不符合人体工学的巨乳细腰,“啊,一个炒作的小网红”。这么想着,我随手划走了。
几个月后的某天,我又刷到了这个小网红——这次她开始卖煎饼。展开全文
“父母无恩,老贼有罪”。父母不对子女享有天然的不可更改的“养育之恩”。历史已经做出了决定,非自卫的故意杀人都是犯罪,无论以何种方式。生而不养就等于杀了这个婴儿,是犯罪。生育者没有选择不养的权利,养育是责任,而非恩情。但至今那些自称最爱他们的子女的那些父母,却拿着已经不存在的养育之恩道德绑架他们的子女,打压他们子女的自由意志,妄图随意捏造子女的人生。这种亲人无亲近可言,他们是老而不死的贼,是毒亲。
如想加入社区参与讨论,请参考 lemmy 教程:https://exploding-heads.com/post/61705
还可以加入社区的官方 xmpp 聊天室:
JID: mybelovedsmother@rooms.dismail.de
Refering to https://allthetropes.org/wiki/My_Beloved_Smother , the parents couldn’t enjoy natural and unchangeable “kindness-to-repay of fostering” toward their children as traditional Chinese morality suggests. The history has judged that non-self-defensive murder is a crime, no matter how, so giving birth to a child without fostering them is not different than killing them, which is a crime. Those who have children do not have the right not to foster them. Fostering is an obligation, not a kindness-to-repay. However, many parents self-praised to love their children with all their heart are hijacking morality with the nonexistent “kindness-to-repay of fostering” to condemn their children, beating down their children’s free will, vainly attempting to fabricate their children’s life. Such parents are not parental. They are moribund harmful old scoundrels. They are “beloved smothers”.
Read the lemmy tutorial https://exploding-heads.com/post/61705 for how to join us.
You can also join the official chatroom of the community on XMPP:
JID: mybelovedsmother@rooms.dismail.de