知乎用户不愿意透露姓名的乱匠在回答白瘦幼审美到底是怎么兴起的?时指出了一种“白瘦幼”,这种“白瘦幼”风格的特点是成年女性却打扮得像十一二岁乃至更年轻的小女孩那样,他用虎扑女神举例,说明大部分普通男性的审美倾向都不是“白瘦幼”。这并不符合事实,尽管和答主定义的那种狭义的扮得像...

知乎用户不愿意透露姓名的乱匠在回答《白瘦幼审美到底是怎么兴起的?》时指出了一种“白瘦幼”,这种“白瘦幼”风格的特点是成年女性却打扮得像十一二岁乃至更年轻的小女孩那样,他用虎扑女神举例,说明大部分普通男性的审美倾向都不是“白瘦幼”。这并不符合事实,尽管和答主定义的那种狭义的扮得像未成年,特别是初中生、小学生的审美倾向有很大差异,但这些女明星事实上也符合“白瘦幼”的标准。而主流舆论对女性的审美要求就是“白瘦幼”。

为什么这么说?可以从“白””“瘦”“幼”三个方面来分析……展开全文

原生家庭
!belovedsmother
Create a post

“父母无恩,老贼有罪”。父母不对子女享有天然的不可更改的“养育之恩”。历史已经做出了决定,非自卫的故意杀人都是犯罪,无论以何种方式。生而不养就等于杀了这个婴儿,是犯罪。生育者没有选择不养的权利,养育是责任,而非恩情。但至今那些自称最爱他们的子女的那些父母,却拿着已经不存在的养育之恩道德绑架他们的子女,打压他们子女的自由意志,妄图随意捏造子女的人生。这种亲人无亲近可言,他们是老而不死的贼,是毒亲。

如想加入社区参与讨论,请参考 lemmy 教程:https://lemmy.tedomum.net/post/39107

还可以加入社区的官方 xmpp 聊天室:
JID: mybelovedsmother@rooms.dismail.de

Refering to https://allthetropes.org/wiki/My_Beloved_Smother , the parents couldn’t enjoy natural and unchangeable “kindness-to-repay of fostering” toward their children as traditional Chinese morality suggests. The history has judged that non-self-defensive murder is a crime, no matter how, so giving birth to a child without fostering them is not different than killing them, which is a crime. Those who have children do not have the right not to foster them. Fostering is an obligation, not a kindness-to-repay. However, many parents self-praised to love their children with all their heart are hijacking morality with the nonexistent “kindness-to-repay of fostering” to condemn their children, beating down their children’s free will, vainly attempting to fabricate their children’s life. Such parents are not parental. They are moribund harmful old scoundrels. They are “beloved smothers”.

Read the lemmy tutorial https://exploding-heads.com/post/61705 for how to join us.

You can also join the official chatroom of the community on XMPP:
JID: mybelovedsmother@rooms.dismail.de

  • 0 users online
  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 1 user / month
  • 1 user / 6 months
  • 40 subscribers
  • 64 Posts
  • 19 Comments
  • Modlog