唐山烧烤店打人事件后,不少人呼吁女性购买随身防身工具,但不知怎么回事,到后来这些建议被这样一种看起来似乎「很有道理」的言论笼罩了:
女性不要携带防身工具,不然会被犯罪分子抢走,成为攻击女性的工具;同理,女性遇到危险也不要反击,能逃就逃,逃不了也千万不要反击,不然下场更惨,因为男性有着「绝对力量」,哪怕女性有武器、锻炼过,男性也是可以轻松制服女性的。
一直以来,「女性怎样保证自己的安全?」这一问题,就有不少与之类似的建议:穿多点、晚上不要出门、不要惹男人生气、独居女性要假装自己家里有男性存在(比如摆男性拖鞋、故意杜撰自己有个异地男朋友),甚至于,真的找个男朋友住进家里。
但问题是,女性真的如此天生弱小吗?男性真的有绝对力量吗?阅读全文
“父母无恩,老贼有罪”。父母不对子女享有天然的不可更改的“养育之恩”。历史已经做出了决定,非自卫的故意杀人都是犯罪,无论以何种方式。生而不养就等于杀了这个婴儿,是犯罪。生育者没有选择不养的权利,养育是责任,而非恩情。但至今那些自称最爱他们的子女的那些父母,却拿着已经不存在的养育之恩道德绑架他们的子女,打压他们子女的自由意志,妄图随意捏造子女的人生。这种亲人无亲近可言,他们是老而不死的贼,是毒亲。
如想加入社区参与讨论,请参考 lemmy 教程:https://lemmy.tedomum.net/post/39107
还可以加入社区的官方 xmpp 聊天室:
JID: mybelovedsmother@rooms.dismail.de
Refering to https://allthetropes.org/wiki/My_Beloved_Smother , the parents couldn’t enjoy natural and unchangeable “kindness-to-repay of fostering” toward their children as traditional Chinese morality suggests. The history has judged that non-self-defensive murder is a crime, no matter how, so giving birth to a child without fostering them is not different than killing them, which is a crime. Those who have children do not have the right not to foster them. Fostering is an obligation, not a kindness-to-repay. However, many parents self-praised to love their children with all their heart are hijacking morality with the nonexistent “kindness-to-repay of fostering” to condemn their children, beating down their children’s free will, vainly attempting to fabricate their children’s life. Such parents are not parental. They are moribund harmful old scoundrels. They are “beloved smothers”.
Read the lemmy tutorial https://exploding-heads.com/post/61705 for how to join us.
You can also join the official chatroom of the community on XMPP:
JID: mybelovedsmother@rooms.dismail.de