I am a 23 years old vegan nyanya, System Administrator and Web Developer.
I use stock Debian.
No problems here.
In the case you use GNOME desktop and has issues with the deprecated AVI format still used in some playes and with GNOME Video app, just install libavcodec-extra or use GNOME-MPV (now named in another name I always forget).
The case for OpenSuse. In reality, they do the right thing given that is an European OS. It is illegal in some European countries to distribute several codecs by default given the copyright holders.
Instead of calling for a negation for their package management you should call for content distributors not using well-deployed and available open formats / codecs as well as the copyright holders of the propietary ones for putting these nonsense as rules.
Maybe integrating both?
To be exact, tagging would be useful a lot for me or similar.
Do you imagine using Lemmy as comment system for torrent-csv.ml over the torrents?
First, the kind of war you try to represent with public domain and copyleft is not, in anyway comparable.
Public domain content doesn’t have almost any kind of protection agaisnt some entity (personal or not) claiming property.
In copyleft world, you don’t have only to rely in yourself, you can create a collective, organization or rely in third party collectives dedicated to that, which exist and are not a few.
The “lore” gets closed in that world since the moment that a propietary copy gets famous and doesn’t contribute back to the original, which, in fact, has no central point of avaliability but it is almost a just 1-release version that in the moment you stop, it will become difficult to track.
Here I see confusion between openness and freedom.
The freedom is in the possibility you have to get each avaliable option, and not in the number of options which is the case in openness.
In the moment that there is a possibility to choose an option which prevents choosing the rest, the freedom is gone.
Do you want avaliability almost forever? It is preferable that you mount a collective or find an entity big enough to handle it.
What is the point of an Open Narrative Framework if anyone can hide your original public domain version by attributing themselves the work and distributing it closed?
This could be made easily through SEO nowadays.
It also involves that derivatives could “improve” without giving back, which could help to other people’s needs.
Basically, what someone already pointed here about maintaining it open.
Bitwarden uses MicroSoft SQL Server as the only DB server option.
It is also the one they run on their main service, so it is not fully FLOSS and I would not consider that DB server reliable at all given its nature.
As Helix pointed before, there is a fully FLOSS replacement compatible with API and clients called Vaultwarden, which is also written in Rust and allow MySQL/MariaDB and PostgreSQL DB servers AFAIR.
You have MetaGer as metasearch engine which can be configured to use its own crawler if self-hosting or InfinitySearch which has several versions and has its own crawler by default plus other indexes. Both FLOSS.
The last one needs self-hosting or payment involved. There is other version which is decentralized too.
About “product” in the sense you explain there, no. I stop reading when someone start using that for describing anything and is not in the sense of simple result of work but in the commercial sense as which inviting people to use something and earn audience (even if money is not involved directly).
BTW, I was just showing jorgesumle their error in their assumption there.
I see your perspective, but not the usefulness of your approach.
I prefer telling them how it works and that is a way to make actual documentation accessible. I also adapt my explanations to each person and situation.
It is preferable to have people who know how to use an OS and not being hanging around without knowing what to do because they expect even the most simple things done.
That said, codecs work great with Debian stock, so I am unsure about the issues you mention.